911 Justice Canada assists Canadians with outreach initiatives that enable the Government of Canada to hear opinions on the 9/11 Terrorist attacks directly from citizens. The mainstream media does an unacceptably poor job of covering the scientific evidence regarding 9/11. 911 Justice Canada brings together activists, thinkers and concerned citizens around this critical issue – enabling them with real actions they can take to make real progress towards justice.
Please watch this recent interview by Press For Truth to hear about the Canadian 9/11 Petition initiative:
Here is what leaders from the citizenry in Canada have to say about Canada and the need for a new 9/11 investigation. Many of these were received in response to an extensive letter describing the evidence developed and distributed by Kip Warner (see below) :
 |
Reporter, copy editor and book review editor at various print newspapers, including The Globe and Mail and New York Times and various online services, including CBC.ca, and Guardian Online. Recipient of Canada’s National Newspaper Award for Critical Writing 1994 and for Feature Writing 1996. Author of Pearls in Vinegar (2004) and Cake or Death (2007).
Heather Mallick’s speech at the Mel Hurtig Annual Lecture on the Future of Canada 10/4/07 Question: Why are we accepting what the American government is telling us happened on September 11, 2001, at face value when it’s all over the Internet that it couldn’t possibly have happened without help from the inside, especially the Building called Number 7, that fell for no reason at all? Heather Mallick: It’s very interesting because even Seymour Hersh, who I trust more than any journalist in the world, says, “I don’t know what happened on 9/11. I’m not sure.” But I think the main reason why we accept that version is because there’s nobody out there in mainstream journalism giving us any information on that. We’re just told what governments and corporations want us to hear. We rely on corporate sources of information. In Canada, our newspapers are owned by — For example the Globe and Mail is owned by CTV. Global owns newspapers published across the country. I still can’t believe that that is true. It’s shocking to me. But you’re never going to get alternative views of current affairs and of history as long as the means of transmitting information is so corporately owned. http://www.multimedia.ualberta.ca •Website: http://www.heathermallick.ca |
 Graeme MacQueen |
Co-Organizer of the Toronto Hearings Born in Nova Scotia, Graeme MacQueen received his Ph.D. in comparative religion from Harvard University and taught in the Religious Studies department of McMaster University for 30 years. In 1989 he became founding Director of the Centre for Peace Studies at McMaster, after which he helped develop the B.A. programme in Peace Studies and co-directed (with $2 million in government, UN and NGO funding) peace-building projects in Sri Lanka, Gaza, Croatia and Afghanistan. He has also contributed to the development of the Women’s Peace Brigade in north India (active now in several states) and was involved for some years in the Third Option, a peace initiative for Afghanistan. He has published numerous peer-reviewed articles and book chapters as well as four books. He took early retirement from McMaster University to devote his energy to peace and justice work.For the past five years most of Graeme’s research has focused on the events and anomalies of 9/11. He has written four research articles on the subject. |
 Lewis Cardinal - Federal NDP Candidate for Edmonton Centre |
Federal NDP Candidate for Edmonton Centre When asked about the events of 9/11, Mr. Cardinal noted that something was not right and yet the events of 9/11 is still very important. Even with his depth of understanding about the world around him, he did not know what actually happened on that day. This petition project will help him and many other Canadians fill in their knowledge gaps. “Well, I think that, ah, I’m not too, ah, understanding of the, ah, of the whole issues around 911, but I know they were important and impacted our country significantly and of course it was a loss for the Americans, as well. But, if think that if there was something done wrong, if there is proven evidence of wrong doing then it should be proceeded with, but I don’t know how our Canadian. govt. can press the issues within the Canadian jurisprudence. See source of quote” |
 John Pilger (Australian) |
Journalism, not truth, is the first casualty of war-John PilgerJournalistDuring the 1970s, I filmed secretly in Czechoslovakia, then a Stalinist dictatorship. The dissident novelist Zdenek Urbánek told me, “In one respect, we are more fortunate than you in the west. We believe nothing of what we read in the newspapers and watch on television, nothing of the official truth. Unlike you, we have learned to read between the lines, because real truth is always subversive.” This acute scepticism, this skill of reading between the lines, is urgently needed in supposedly free societies today. Take the reporting of state-sponsored war. The oldest cliché is that truth is the first casualty of war. I disagree. Journalism is the first casualty. Not only that: it has become a weapon of war, a virulent censorship that goes unrecognised in the United States, Britain and other democracies; censorship by omission, whose power is such that, in war, it can mean the difference between life and death for people in faraway countries, such as Iraq. |
 Gary Warner: P.E. Mechanical Engineer - 9/11 Explosive Evidence: Experts Speak Out |
Gary Warner P.E. Mechanical Engineer – 9/11 Explosive Evidence: Experts Speak Out“We found the incendiary super-thermite in the dust. This new, highly destructive substance was made for the Pentagon only. Our question is simple, ‘Why is the fingerprint of the Pentagon throughout the dust?’”"Knowing the truth by following the evidence carefully, as disturbing as it is, in the end is very refreshing. Clearly, everyone must see the evidence and come to their own conclusions about what happened on 9/11.”
“NIST employed finite element analysis in an attempt to explain Building 7′s 5:00 o’clock destruction. FEA is my specialty; have been doing it for 22 years, creating software and using it to design/build. We carefully examined their computer model and found it deeply flawed. We all know the NIST engineers are very competent in their work. So, how could the National Institute for Standards and Technology make such gross errors in so important a study that took years and millions to complete?” “Molten iron is a thermite product of combustion, and it cuts steel columns very effectively. Why would NIST claim that the yellow effervescing metal pouring out the WTC window is aluminum, when it clearly is not? Molten aluminum is silver, like mercury.” And my favourite from Niels Harrit, which may not be exact: “You don’t find 9-11, 9-11 finds you.” |
 Interview with Canadian Engineer Werner Simbeck after the Press Conference Announcing the 1000th AE911Truth Petition Signer |
After the Press Conference Announcing the 1000th AE911Truth Petition Signer Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth get exposure on A Channel news in Victoria, British Columbia “There were no planes hitting that building. There was no proper investigation or explanation given why that building also fell in the way and the fashion that it did. It basically collapsed at free fall speed. That’s not possible. That can only happen if you remove all the core columns in the right moment in a controlled demolition fashion as we have seen on TV.” |
 David Long, 9/11 Eye witness and petition author |
Eye witness and petition author I was standing on Vesey St., which is the same street that Tower 7 is on. “As an eye witness to 9/11, I did not experience the [so called] ‘terrorist attacks’ on television. I was there. Today, I understand why my account of the events of 9/11 differs from what is often told by the media. The real issue here is one of censorship. It has been over 10 years since this important event which still affects us today. In my opinion, from the outset, the true story of 9/11 has been largely ignored by the mainstream media. As a loyal Canadian, I wrote and worked on this petition to parliament in order to warn my homeland that it needs to find out why these buildings collapsed the way they did. Without this knowledge, I am certain that Canada is heading in the wrong direction. We invaded Afghanistan as a result of 9/11, and have taken part in the War On Terror – something that has resulted in the deaths of millions of innocent people. Therefore. there can be nothing of greater importance than finding out the true cause of the free fall collapse of the 3 world trade center towers.I call upon all Canadian members of parliament to look at the scientific evidence presented by 1405 Canadians. We ask if you can in good conscience continue to keep silent on this issue. Regardless of their party affiliation, whether social democrat, liberal or conservative, I believe that all Canadians respect truth and honesty. Members of parliament in Canada, please review our petition closely and see that the scientific truth is clear and unambiguous. It is not a matter of public opinion when matters of science are concerned. After that, please respond to our petition and trust that Canadians will respect you most for your honesty and integrity. ” |
 Author of "Open Letter to the Minister of Public Safety Regarding 9/11" |
Open Letter to the Minister of Public Safety Regarding 9/11 Dear Sir, It is my understanding that Public Safety Canada was provided with a mandate enacted on March 23rd 2005 by the Government of Canada to ensure that Canadians are safe from a range of risks such as natural disasters, crime, and terrorism. The Department has stated that there is no more fundamental role for government than the protection of its citizens. I write you then in an open letter as a private citizen regarding the Government of Canada’s official disposition to the events of 9/11, and all derived matters predicated there upon. As in the case of a series of domino pieces, it is not logical to discuss new events causally linked with preceding ones as though they were disparate. Whether it be increased airport and border security, changes in foreign policy and the role of C.S.I.S., law enforcement, immigration, the lectures heard within the auditoriums of our universities, the deployment of military ordnance and men abroad, debates on the procurement of war materials, they are all preceded with the tragic aforementioned event that claimed thousands of lives, 24 of which were Canadian and with lasting consequences for others. It is not unreasonable to reflect on them as a set of issues forming an arborescence and sharing a common root, or significant mutual event that preceded all of them. The influence has been undeniable. Perhaps the most generally salient of these derived issues is the deployment of military assets and personnel to the nation of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan, currently estimated at a cost approaching $22,000,000,000 by some estimates and having claimed the lives of 154 members of the Canadian Forces through their selfless sacrifice. This was initiated with the approval of the Governor General of Canada, then The Right Honourable Adrienne Clarkson, in response to the recommendation of the Minister of National Defence, then The Honourable Arthur Eggleton, who authorized on September 20th 2001 Canadian Forces members on exchange assignments in the United States and other allied nations to participate in operations responding to the 9/11 attacks. Other nations followed, including the governments of France, Denmark, Poland, Germany, Turkey, Romania, Australia, Spain, the United Kingdom, and at least 36 other nations. The premise for the deployment, given the attacks were the result of al-Qaeda and resulted in the deaths of 24 Canadians, was the desire for regional stability from where the assailants had originated and the proactive prevention of similar incidents occurring in the future. The Prime Minister publicly reminisced on the fifth anniversary that “that is why the countries of the United Nations with unprecedented unity and determination launched their mission to Afghanistan to deal with the source of the 9/11 terror and to end, once and for all, the brutal regime that horribly mistreated its own people while coddling terrorists.” This was done at the request and with the cooperation of the Government of the United States. The foundational premise, or first domino, has recently been called into question with… |
 The Honourable Russ Heibert, MP |
The Honourable Russ Heibert (South Surrey, White Rock, Cloverdale) states that he has actually looked into the matter and finds the evidence compelling.“I have examined the information you shared with me and also perused other information on the subject of the collapse of Building 7 of the World Trade Centre on September 11, 2001. I don’t have any follow-up questions to ask you at this time. It is clear at this point that the root causes of the collapse of Building 7 have not been decisively determined, nor may they ever be.” |
| Bill Vander Zalm (28th Premier of British Columbia from 1986 to 1991) | “I was very impressed with your presentation and your way of presenting but most of all I was impressed with your broad knowledge of so many things happening…Your letter is extremely well written and documented.”Mr Vander Zalm and I met in private at his home after he had read the letter. I then provided him with an additional briefing and answered any questions he had. Mr Vander Zalm’s knowledge of both this matter and those tangential was remarkable and extensive. |
| Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) | “I found [your letter to the government] on the internet…It’s very well written…It’s pretty interesting and obviously the kind of stuff we’re interested in…For stuff like this, this is exactly for us…Thank you very much and I will look into it…I’ll make sure it gets to who it needs to,” (Christina). |
| David Johnson (Governor General) | “I regret that the Governor General cannot intervene in matters that are the responsibility of public or elected officials.” The British North America Act of 1867 vests executive power in Her Majesty the Queen of Canada who is represented in person by the Governor General of Canada, His Excellency the Right Honourable David Johnson. He may be perceived as ceremonial, but in actuality, his legal mandate bestows him with the highest domestic public office the nation has to offer, exceeding even that of the Prime Minister’s Office. This is why the Prime Minister must secure the Governor General’s permission in the dissolution of Parliament or in the deployment of military force abroad. Nevertheless, this matter of grave concern was an unregistered interest. Televised spectator games featuring acts of violence that merely affect the lives of a handful of people at a given time warranted commentary. |
| Enza Uda (Associate Producer, CBC News, Go Public) | “I’ve read your essay — which is well-written and well-researched. However, we are not the forum to air your paper,” (Enza Uda).Enza’s mandate is to hold powers that be accountable. She has worked before to uncover a war criminal who is now an old man and whose former government is long departed. She refused to forward the document to an appropriate forum on the grounds that it was not of interest to the CBC. Listen here. |
| Hardy Staub (Liberal MP candidate for South Surrey – White Rock – Cloverdale) | “Thank you for your document that I read with interest…I noticed that you had sent it to a variety of very important people and at this stage those are the people I would have sent it to as well…Once elected however I could forward it to the appropriate members of our new government,” (Hardy Staub). |
| Jasbir Sandhu (Member of Parliament for Surrey North, NDP, Official Opposition Critic for Public Safety) | The letter was read in its entirety before him privately in his constituency office where I found him to be both very reasonable and receptive. He acknowledged that he was already suspicious of the collapse of the north and south towers, but was not aware of the third building to collapse in NYC until the briefing. He found the information quite reasonable, given that, as he noted, “there were no WMDs in Iraq”. He requested several weeks to examine the letter in greater detail and review the additional material he was provided with. He will provide his party’s official response to the five points made in the conclusion of my letter when Parliament reconvenes in September 2011. Given that Mr Sandhu is the official opposition critic for the Public Safety portfolio, the intended recipient of my letter, and given that he is in good rapport with the Minister responsible for that cabinet position, the information he is now in possession with left me thinking that it was in appropriate hands. Several weeks passed, giving Mr Sandhu ample time to review the material. In a followup meeting, he claimed he had not had time to review the material, had not liaised with the Minister, and was still preoccupied with other things of “higher priority” – among them, by his own admission, a review of a bill to extend the Anti-Terrorism Act. In the end, he refused to sign the petition demanding a new investigation, although his clerk signed it on the spot, while he requested an indeterminate amount of time to reflect on the matter. He did, however, concede that personal safety was an issue in his decision at that point. |
| Kathy Tomlinson (Journalist, CBC News, Go Public) | Did not express interest after receiving letter. Listen here.”We hold powers that be accountable,” (CBC Go Public website). |
| Mark Kelley (CBC The National / News: Morning) | “Hi Kip…This is an extraordinary piece of work,” he remarked in May of 2011, though leaving the question of responsibility hanging. Over the course of about nine months, I found it interesting that the CBC found some things newsworthy and other things not. Mark was repeatedly approached gently with the request that he go on the air, as he does so regularly, and clarify the matter by simply stating the truth. Excuses were presented from time constraints to a lack of interest. In January of 2012, my tone escalated to highlight the gravity of the situation and the necessity that, as a journalist, he inform the public. His response and my followup can be found here. |
| Mary Dawson (Office of the Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner) | “I wish to confirm that I was able to open and print your letter addressed to Minister Toews. I have passed on your request to our investigation division for their review and our office will contact you with a response as soon as possible,” (Jocelyne Brisebois, Communications Officer for the Parliamentary Office of the Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner). |
| Niels Harrit (Associate Professor, Department of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen) | “This is brilliant writing, clever and comprehensive. Terrific, solid work, well documented, learned a lot myself. Just to quote UNSC 1368 should be enough for all of us,” (Niels Harrit).Professor Harrit was among the original whistleblowers to expose the discovery of nano-thermite uncovered in the dust of the WTC ruins. |
| Office of the Prosecutor International Criminal Court | Inquired a total of forty-one times before receipt was finally acknowledged, though I was advised that a receipt “does not mean that an investigation will be conducted”. It was downloaded at least 12 times from an address on their subnet (213.208.214.206), according to the Apache access logs. |
| Patricia Graham (Editor-in-chief, Vancouver Sun) | Patricia was apprised of the false flag issue by my father’s presentation at the Vancouver Club August, 2010 as were the many other high profile individuals present, such as an ex US diplomat, supreme court judge, and several prominent CEOs. All now are aware of the evidence and that Architects and Engineers for 9-11 Truth are asking for a new independent investigation. Patricia, for reasons unknown, so far has failed to report on the matter. We would hope for better from the editor of our local newspaper. |
| Paul Hellyer (Former Minister of National Defence and Former Deputy Prime Minister of Canada) | “I have managed to carefully read the letter to Minister Toews and to scan the attached document concerning thermitic material. I must congratulate you on the very comprehensive manner in which you have assembled the information contained in your letter. It is most impressive. (…) All I can do is to thank you for the exhaustive work that you have undertaken and to hope – which I know is a very long hope – that the minister or one of his colleagues will take it seriously and commission the required analysis. (…)”In my mind you are demonstrating the qualities of integrity, loyalty, courage, honesty, fairness and responsibility putting service to humanity before self-interest which is something that should be expected of all of us, but I know quite a few people who wouldn’t see it that way,” (Paul Hellyer). |
| Peace Arch News | Published with much gratitude to Lance Peverly, editor, for his courage in demonstrating real journalism in prioritizing the needs of an informed community before career. |
| RCMP, White Rock Detachment | “I went through your material last night and you’ve done everything you can. You’ve gone to the right agencies and something like that is way out of my purview and jurisdiction. (…) As far as we’re concerned here in White Rock, it’s where it’s supposed to be. I don’t have the resources to deal with anything like that here,” (Sgt Roland Pierschke). |
| RCMP National Security Information Network | RCMP National Security Investigator currently investigating and considered the letter to be “legitimate”.”The National Security Information Line has a mandate to collect information from the general public regarding terrorist activity,” (NSIN website). |
| Russ Hiebert (Member of Parliament for South Surrey – White Rock – Cloverdale, Conservative) | The letter was read in its entirety before him privately at his constituency office. He found it “very interesting” and requested an electronic copy of the letter to verify footnotes, along with some time to digest the material presented to him. He later responded in writing where he acknowledged that the official government explanation for the collapse of WTC7 was not satisfactory. |
| Special Senate Committee on Anti-terrorism | Barbara Reynolds, Committee Clerk, confirmed receipt. She has been notified that I am available to testify before the Senate, if they wish. |
| Stewart Bell (Journalist, The National Post) | Confirmed via electronic confirmation receipt. |
| The Guardian | Confirmed via electronic confirmation receipt. |
| The Leader-Post | Confirmed via electronic confirmation receipt. |
| The National Post | Confirmed via electronic confirmation receipt. |
| Toronto Sun | Confirmed via electronic confirmation receipt. |
| Vic Toews (Minister of Public Safety) | Hard copy dispatched registered post and signed for by mail processing clerk, Mr M Dery. After at least half a dozen attempts by email to confirm the Minister’s receipt, including by telephone, Cheri Elliott, the Minister’s personal Executive Assistant, finally prepared to bring the letter to the Minister’s attention by forwarding it personally to him with the message body of “FYI”, unintentionally addressed it to myself. Three minutes later, having realized his mistake, he then attempted unsuccessfully to recall the email.As a consequence, the Minister’s potential justification of future plausible deniability, with respect to personally having been made aware of the document, has now been destroyed. |
| John McMurtry Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada University of Guelph Professor Emeritus UN author & editor of Philosophy and World Problems | Your letter is superb. Your connecting it to relevant authorities in explanation and in sending it to them to incite some public responsibility is equally masterful. Thank you doing this on all our behalves |
| Graeme MacQueen PhD, Harvard Associate Professor, McMaster University Founder of McMaster University Centre for Peace Studies Co-director of Media & Peace Education in Afghanistan | Your research is sound…We definitely need to begin holding our elected representatives in Canada to account on this, and your letter is one way to start that…I want to say that I love the way you’ve used UNSC 1368. I’ve often quoted it in presentations, but I simply argue that it provided no justification for the invasion of Afghanistan: as you correctly argue, what it actually does is obligate governments to seek the true perpetrators of the 9/11 crimes…Maybe there is a way the Canadian 9/11 truth movement, which is pretty scattered at the moment, can unite around a couple of main items, such as your letter, in the not-too-distant future…Thanks for the very eloquent letter. |
| Andrea | I want to attempt to express the enormity of my respect for you… Your letter is up there as a work of great political literature, in a league with the Declaration of Independence, Letter From The Birmingham Jail, etc. |
| Larry Democracy Now! UVic Radio, an Independent News Hour | Amazing letter, just read it, incredible work keeping track of all the recipients, and the many non-responses. You’re a real patriot. Some of the recipients really picked on the wrong fellow to try and pretend they didn’t receive the letter. |
| Peter Retired Canadian Infantry Officer Platoon Commander Military Historian | I agree with this thought provoking thesis and believe that further investigation into the 9/11 event will take place because of it. |
| Christopher Porter Canadian Action Party Leader | It is very well written. You are a gifted writer…Glad to have you with us…It is a great letter and one that should shine above many on the subject. |
| John Professional Engineer | I just wanted to say that its one of the best letters on 9/11, integrating in the appropriate issues and historical perspective, that I have ever read. |
| Joseph Medical Oncologist Clinical Professor Faculty of Medicine University of British Columbia | I have never seen a better written letter! Very well done! |
| Anna Law Student University of Durham | This letter has truly opened my eyes. My respect for your commitment to discovering the truth and the passion underlying this exceptionally high quality letter is substantial. |
| Rachelle | This is an amazing work, thanks for using your energy to do and say the things some of us are not able, in such a courageous and concise way. I pray this letter will not fall on deaf ears, I truly pray. |
| Ellen Librarian | You are right on! And you are very brave…I fear that democracy in Canada is a mere charade, if it ever truly existed. We need to continue the efforts and I applaud you. Thanks again for your thoughtful letter. |
| Joe Undergraduate Student University of British Columbia | Congratulations. Your letter is excellent. The issue that you raise is one that I am very familiar with, and while the implications are unfortunate and frightening, I tend to agree with your views. I have encountered everything that you mention in your letter, however it was impressive to see it gathered so cogently, and with such immediacy. |
| Ed Computer Science Instructor University of British Columbia | Very well written … with lots of references…You make some great points, and it sounds like there are a lot of other people, with excellent credentials, who also want answers… But, you’ve done your research well, and wrote a good letter. |
| Jackie | What an amazing letter! The world needs more citizens like you who are critical thinkers, objective researchers, intelligent observers, with the strength of character to stand up for what they believe it. Your letter is an act of moral courage, and I would hope that in the Canadian, and global context, we have room for those who take action against evil. It reminds me of a quote from Ayn Rand: ‘The evil of the world is made possible by nothing but the sanction you give it.’ Thank-you for not sanctioning it! |
| Raymond | Your letter to Vic Toews is outstanding, a most remarkable piece or research and composition. |
| Blair Retired Canadian Infantry Officer Plantoon Commander | I’ve read your letter and it looks to be extremely well researched and documented. |
| Mark Film Studies Instructor University of British Columbia | Good letter. Too bad Ottawa seems stone deaf to everything not uttered by the 46 richest Canadians (worth as much as the 14,000,000 poorest) and/or the American plutocrats who tell them what to do. |
| Danielle Elementary School Teacher | I thought your letter was excellent. It actually blew me away how precise all of your details were. |
| David Software Engineer Retired Canadian Artilleryman | I read your letter. It is 100% correct in my view. |
| Jim | Got it from the Canadian Action party website – let’s give these people hell on earth, like they want to do to us! |
| DeVries | A big applause and thank you for a very well crafted and referenced letter to Vic Toews on the matter of 911 truth… Last fall my eyes finally opened on the subject and it is good to see that people like you are taking action. I am also encourage that an existing Canadian federal party has actually taking on this difficult subject and is trying to get to the root of the problem. |
| Victor | I read the letter you sent to Vic Toews…The content of your letter is bang on. |
| Dan Law Student University of British Columbia | I read your letter – very well done. I like your low key strategy. Let people read the letter, and the (non)responses, and let them make up their own minds. |
| Ilia Economics Undergraduate Student University of British Columbia | As someone who has spent many years perfecting my own writing skill I must congratulate you on this work, which is both well written and well argued. I wasn’t familiar with the all the facts regarding traces of explosive material found in the WTC rubble, and while it’s still somewhat challenging for me to wrap my head around the letter’s main argument, I must say that my opinion on this issue has certainly been influenced your research. |
Blog this!- Bookmark on Delicious
- Digg this post
- Recommend on Facebook
- Buzz it up
- Share on Linkedin
- Share via MySpace
- Share on netvibes
- share via Reddit
- Share with Stumblers
- Share on technorati
- Tweet about it
- Share on xing
- Buzz it up
- Subscribe to the comments on this post
- Bookmark in Browser
- Tell a friend
I have heard people saying this is a conspiracy and is not true; I have heard people saying that this is not their business. Firstly, yes it is not your problem, but no, it is your future problem. Who are these people with power so great that they murder people with ease in front of the public!? Is it for money or power? I am afraid that something like this would happen again in the future if we do not become stronger together with people who have the same rationale and wisdom, and let the world see the real justice. It could happen to us, our family, children, and loved ones. From my knowledge, Steel alloy does not melt until it is reaches ~1500′C, that is the temperature of lava coming out from the earth. It will bend before that, and even if it melts, it will be like ice melting and does not ‘explode’ far away from the vicinity. It is like bending an iron bar, it does not scatter to pieces. I wish the government of Canada to support this investigation. I am just a student, but I am where everyone else have been in the past. This way we can be a role model for the younger generation to see, not by murdering people in the daylight just to gain some money or power.
Please forward your comments to Paul Dewar and ask him to submit the petition to parliament.
thanks!